|
|
U.S. prepared to grab Iran's southwestern majority Arab and oil-rich province after saturation bombing of Iranian nuclear, chemical, and command, control, communications & intelligence (C3I) targets
By: Various on: 11.08.2005 [09:26 ] (2915 reads)
|
Report: Israel ready for pre-emptive strike against Iran's nuclear facility
|
|
(6635 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Temporary offline
by Yasis on 11.08.2005 [09:43 ]
|
|
|
Probably just war scares to frighten the Iranians while EU-Iran nuclear talks are going.
If this was the DPRK, Kim Jong Il would have laughed and tell the US to bring it on.
|
by stopwar on 11.08.2005 [10:05 ]
|
|
|
from their current internal problems with masses of "embarrassing" (at the very least) information getting out re 9/11.
|
by paul pawlowski on 11.08.2005 [10:10 ]
|
|
|
Sharon Bush Blair will do to Iran what they did to Iraq.
|
by Yasis on 11.08.2005 [10:19 ]
|
|
|
Not a single name mentioned in the entire news item.
"The German intelligence comes from classified briefings provided by elements within the CIA that are concerned the neocons in the Bush administration will, in attacking Iran, set off a chain of events that will lead to world war."
CIA concerned? Don't make me laugh.
|
by stopwar on 11.08.2005 [10:33 ]
|
|
|
One hears that there is an internal conflict within Mi6. Maybe this is also the case within the CIA. Part of the CIA (the part that goes for control by economic, not military means) MIGHT WELL be concerned.
|
by onlyhuman on 11.08.2005 [10:38 ]
|
|
|
dont have enough balls to attack or nuke Iran. Bring it on chimpy boy.
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 11.08.2005 [12:56 ]
|
|
|
Absolutely NOT ALLOWED! Of that I have no doubt.
|
by BERNIE on 11.08.2005 [16:04 ]
|
|
|
Possibly, bush/cheney visit to SAUDI ARABIA was to
CONVINCE the saudi's to allow isreali airplanes to fly
over their territory to bomb IRAN.
|
by stopwar on 11.08.2005 [16:47 ]
|
|
|
There was plenty of it pre-iraqwar. As the Hutton Report website will confirm. Making Captain Scarlett the head of MI6 was probably intended to stop all that. I don't know...
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 11.08.2005 [16:55 ]
|
|
|
U might vbe right, or mayby georgie boy wanted to rake some arab anal, afterall, his troops are doing it in Iraq!
Mi6 disquiet. Yes perhaps there was some friction then, but the head was a govt drone and so were most of the others in that institution that supports one of the most evil Govts of the nation in the history of the planet.
I have no doubt NOW that after the discord then, but now I have reason to believe that a crackdown was instigated to prevent the same thing happening. Would help explain the now utter silence (even more bizzare not that its never been easier to join the bandwaggon in exposing the evil doings of bLiar, probably the same in MI5 too, after the utter silence of the 7/7 bombs) Ask Frank Gardner he would know.
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 11.08.2005 [16:58 ]
|
|
|
- LOL, but he was a good guy. This Scarlet is a willing conspirator in mass murder, agression, torture, rape, crimes against humanity and Naziism. Another sod to go on my Santa's wishlist of convistions I want to see for Xmas.
|
by cm on 11.08.2005 [17:48 ]
|
|
|
These are additional articles to those that reveal an intensity of planning and moreover taking practical measures for an attack on Iran.
Certainly, they also play the hand of blackmail in the ongoing negotiations between Iran and EU, Russia, e.t.c..
But, I also think they are serious. The prepare the public opinion on such an event. The missing link is the event that would provide the opportunity for such a strike. For example, an Al Qaida attack in the US soil would both enable Bush to turn the public opinion in his favor (he is rapidly losing popular support nowdays) and moreover accomplish the coup of the attack on Iran.
Also, please take into consideration that the main body of the US intelligence apparatus is/was against the Iraq adventure (and we could suppose that the same holds with respect to Iran). It is this opposition that forced Bush to "restructure" the US intelligence services. So, it is not surprising if such disagreements come out to the open. Of course, I am not saying that the "good" CIA opposes the "bad" CIA. This is a struggle that has to do with the best strategy and tactics to achieve US supremacy. Recall that similar fight occured within the German state when Hitler came to power (and, honestly, I think that Bush resembles Hitler more and more as time passes by).
|
by Econ on 11.08.2005 [19:20 ]
|
|
|
.
|
by Neal on 11.08.2005 [22:01 ]
|
|
|
.
|
by stopwar on 11.08.2005 [22:22 ]
|
|
|
what do you make of the above scenario from Neal? You said they wouldn't dare attack Iran now that China was in the game? This was making sense.
But if Neal is right... could it mean these "risk players" are now so desperate they are prepared to blow up the board, rather than lose the ultimate battle?
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 12.08.2005 [09:09 ]
|
|
|
and there is much sense in what he says. Dear Lord, please see to it that Neal is wrong.
Its difficult to imagine even the thicko warloving neocon slim opening another front, although I admit, they have concern for the longevity of the US. They have already made their millions from the US. They can fly away at the drop of a hat.
But even if the USUK & zionist pigs do hit Iran and syria respectively, The response from these countries is not likely to bring about the destruction of the planet. The powerholding parasites currently occupying Palestine dont give a rats arse if some palestinians, egyptions and so called "Israyhell-ies' die it wont be THEM THEMSELVES that suffer. They too simply need to pop onto a free illegal-state provided aircraft and fly to Tazmania or Argentina, Bolivia or even hide in the US with the old neoconazionst US administration.
I seriously doubt Iran has nukes ready for defense. Targetting of Dimona is hard, even cruise missiles missed their targets. why disbelieve American smart bombs {spit} but believe Iran has it.
Unfortunately I think the USUK/parasites occupying Palestine have done a risk and damage assessment and think the damage "they" will suffer, is tolerable.
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 12.08.2005 [09:13 ]
|
|
|
.
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
