|
|
Assad consolidates power in Syria as UN warns of new action over Lebanon
By: AFP on: 10.06.2005 [04:19 ] (1873 reads)
|
(4389 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Temporary offline
by IvanGrozny on 10.06.2005 [08:32 ]
|
|
|
Besides the fact that the UN is turning into a tool of US aggression.
|
by Yasis on 10.06.2005 [09:14 ]
|
|
|
Which leader does not consolidate power?
|
by Syrian on 10.06.2005 [09:33 ]
|
|
|
It's no wonder the UN/US hate him so much. Everything he says puts poison in their veins.
The UN is a joke. We pulled out, the told us to "dismantle hezbollah", how can we if we pulled out? Now that they realised that they're trying to play on a busted hand, they try to get us to remove the intelligence officers.
HAHAHAHAHAHA, little do they know that half of lebanon is our mokhabarat. And they will never leave.
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [11:06 ]
|
|
|
That is an Exceptional comment you made.and that view must be correct.I spent a while thinking about why would Syria pull its troops out of Lebannon when those troops acted as a Northern protection backdrop for Syria.To Me that didnt make sense.
But Your point you made about Hezzbollah and Syria not being able now too dismantle them,because Syrian troops are out of the country and it makes it harder for them to be blamed for any Hezbollah action Is obviously the Key and there thinking.
Syria has been very clever in its thinking and what it has done and the U.N NWO has suddenly realised.
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [12:07 ]
|
|
|
...the U.N NWO has suddenly realised...
Who runs the UN, profile?
( Clue: it never takes action against US ot Israel. All other countries are fair game. )
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [12:30 ]
|
|
|
The U.N was set up after WW2 Directly after and was created in effect by France-Britain-Germany-U.S Financed and maintained by the founding G7 nations(Paris Club) which were France-Britain-Germany-Italy-Switzerland-Canada-U.S and it is controlled by these members.They Created and maintained and Financed the U.N.
The U.N Is a tool that the NWO Use the same as the EU is a creation-maintained-financed and Controled by its founding members France,Germany,Britain and the G7 nations an NWO Tool.
the U.S is also a tool.The U.S People do not control the Federal Reserve run by Greenscam that was outsourced 50 years ago.Israel is also a Creation an NWO Tool.Run and maintained and financed by these very same people.Out of The G7 Nations.All those Countries and Organisations are NWO assetts and Controlled by them.
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [12:37 ]
|
|
|
"A new press law was expected to allow private media to play an essential role in the future."
translation: we hope to control Syria's media too in the future
"As Syria faces international pressure over a clampdown on dissidents"
translation: we are threatining Syria because it does not allow our men to take control
"If the regime does not change, banned opposition National Democratic Movement spokesman Abdel Azim said, "Syria will face real danger, the kind that has happened in Iraq.""
translation: Diebold's man is frustrated already and can't do much without his master's direct military intervention
"According to sources close to the participants, some delegates harshly criticised Foreign Minister Faruq al-Shara for his dealings with Lebanon and the United States."
translation: we won't reveal our sources because there are none and we just thought this up. We thought this would trigger your herd instinct to join the bandwagon of imaginary opposition.
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [12:47 ]
|
|
|
...the U.S is also a tool.The U.S People do not control the Federal Reserve run by Greenscam that was outsourced 50 years ago.
what do you have to say about the European people? you just made the European people look guilty by omission, was that intended or not?
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [12:48 ]
|
|
|
The translation seems about right.
These are very devious people that want World Domination they will do anything to acheive that by using either fair or foul means to get what they want.And They play all of us against each other.Divide and conquer tactics in everything they do.
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [13:21 ]
|
|
|
It is not the European-U.S-Russian-Israeli or Chinese Citizens that are the problem.All of the Citizens in all of the countries are just decent people that want to get on with their lives,spend time with family-friends and live life positively and productively.
It is the real power sources in those countries behind the scenes that are the problem.And these people themselves are puppets they take their orders from elsewhere.Who they are I have no idea,Some people say it is Zionists others Illuminati others Freemasons others Satanists or a combination of all of these.I have No idea.
All i can see is that there is a quest for World Domination because of everything that has happened the last 5 years,it does exist there is an agenda.All of these things such as Iraq-North Korea-Iran-Syria-EU Constitution-Ukraine are all linked together-related and interconnected because of this Agenda.For myself in looking at things i dont seperate Iraq from North Korea etc i try and look for connections.The NWO are based in those countries i wrote above,those countries are its assetts and it uses its assetts to get what it wants which is Future "One World Goverment"These Devious NWO people based in these countries have no love or loyalty for their own country or citizens they use them to get what they want.They are self serving everything is for the benefit of them and not us who reside in those countries.
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [13:22 ]
|
|
|
"The congress pledged to press ahead with reform..."
the euphemism "reform" has a connotation of "improvement" of something that is "wrong".
translation: we want you to believe our changes are necessary for your life, we want you to think your life as it is now is wrong.
"...adopting the principle of a "social market economy""
"market economy" is an euphemism for lawless capitalism, but it's old and now it has negative connotations.
translation: we embellish lawless capitalism as "social lawless capitalism" hoping it'll be a sweter pill for you to swallow.
"...that would transform the pervasive public sector while supporting the private sector"
"transform" has a cheerful, positive vibration, unlike the term "shrink" which is the direction the transformation will actually take.
"Public sector", ownership by the people, is made to look undesirable by calling it "pervasive", or unwanted and hard to remove like a pest.
translation: we steal all your assets and you will feel relieved and a lot better.
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [13:28 ]
|
|
|
"...what it wants which is Future "One World Goverment"These Devious NWO people"
In which way is NWO different or more devious than plain old Imperialism? Doesn't Imperialism aspire to acquiring total control of the world as well? Is NWO a new phenomenon or a just a repetition of history?
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [14:03 ]
|
|
|
if you used the world Imperialism instead of NWO, people would think you were talking about the United States. That is not what you intend, isn't it?
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [14:13 ]
|
|
|
Imperial Order is good way of describing it.The reason for using the term NWO was because it is well documented and that is how others describe it NWO "New World Order".
Imperial Order is Just as good of which it is.It can be called anything.The Intergalactic Federation of these people (and Not us).Serving Their Benefit (and Not Ours).Lol
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [14:19 ]
|
|
|
I prefer Imperialism, because the United States is the center around which all of it revolves... Imperial coin, Imperial army, everything.
..The Intergalactic Federation of these people .
And if you go to outer space you'll find the United States too... Star wars, Missile shield, space weapons... it's all Made in the U.S.A. So for me, Imperialism, with its U.S.-centric connotation fits the bill perfectly. If I used NWO I'd be diverting attention from the Mammmoth that consumes 50% of all the world's resources, an still wants more.
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [14:32 ]
|
|
|
I Tried not myself to use the word Imperialism because of its Historical Connotations towards Europe with French Colonial Imperialism-British Colonial Imperialism-Roman Imperical Army etc.I recognised that the U.S historically Was a former Colony itself.It in its History came under Imperialism.
So i tended to steer away from using the word Imperialism and Stuck with the word NWO.Both basically mean the same.The Intergalactic Federation of these people (and Not us).Serving Their Benefit (and Not Ours).Lol
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [14:33 ]
|
|
|
''...The reason for using the term NWO was because it is well documented and that is how others describe it NWO "New World Order".
it's the same with Imperialism, which is even better documented and it's how it's been described for decades: "Imperialism".
I can't help but conclude that you made either an unconscious choice or settled for NWO for other reasons you don't want to share with us...?
the word Imperialism is too linked to the USA in people's minds, I think this fact played an important role in your choice to avoid using the term.
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [14:41 ]
|
|
|
...I Tried not myself to use the word Imperialism because of its Historical Connotations towards Europe
For a moment I thought you would talk about the Roman Empire, but I see you're only stuck in the 19th century... not too bad.
now look out of the window and tell us whether you see Roman legions or a Coca-Cola billboard the size of the horizon. And tell us, is the international currencys the pound sterling still or the US $TURD$?
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [14:49 ]
|
|
|
...the U.S historically Was a former Colony itself.It in its History came under Imperialism.
You must be refering to the American indians, I can't see how you can portray the white settlers as victims of imperialism. Now you see what you have done, profile? you just made me feel so sorry for those poor white American victims..
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [14:59 ]
|
|
|
The Native Indians suffered terrible oppresion at the hands of Imperialism.The Europe Settlers into America under Imperialism caused those poor people untold Suffering.Those same European Settlers that did that to the Native Indians,Were themselves latter in American History to suffer at the Hands Of European (British+French) Imperialism.(The Persecuted becomes the persecutor)That Changed For those people when they fought and won a war of Independance against Imperialism.Imperialism causes Suffering which is one reason why a "One World Order" is not good for us because it is Imperical by Nature.
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [15:10 ]
|
|
|
you always end making me feel sorry for the United Sodomites of America. Congratulations!
|
by profile on 10.06.2005 [15:23 ]
|
|
|
No Xuma not at all.We should all feel sorry for each other we are all the victims of Imperialism more so now than any time in the last 100 years.And Imperialism will never bring us towards a positive direction.Because Imperialism is all about Keeping other people down.That is why i want the Iraqi People to regain control of their country completely,because Imperialism will only bring them Suffering.Even if U.S Troops leave and their Internal Infastrucure is controlled by the Imperialists.Those Iraqis will still Suffer.Imperialism is the The Intergalactic Federation of these people (and Not us).Serving Their Benefit (and Not Ours).
|
by Xuma100 on 10.06.2005 [16:57 ]
|
|
|
...they fought and won a war of Independance against Imperialism
wow!... I can barely hold back tears of emotion thinking about how those brave Amerians, with their hands still red of Indian blood, decided to take on their bosses and take the racket off Britain's hands. Since then the USA has been a beacon of anti-Imperialismin the world. Thank you profile, good job!.
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
