|
|
US Totalitarian Tendencies exposed
By: BlackPanther on: 10.05.2005 [10:35 ] (2052 reads)
|
Those who grew up during the peak years of the Cold War are struck by an emerging pattern in US foreign policy. The pattern suggests that throughout those Cold War years, the US projected on the Soviet Union its own intentions and inclinations, accusing the latter of seeking to set up a world government, seeking to spread the Soviet version of communism to every corner of the globe, when in fact it was the US which sought to impose its form of corporate cannibalism on the whole world.
|
|
(13922 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Temporary offline
by wings on 10.05.2005 [18:42 ]
|
|
|
"Finally, a totalitarian ideology would be one that is concerned with total destruction and total reconstruction, involving typically an ideological acceptance of violence as the only practicable means for such total destruction. It might accordingly be defined as ‘a reasonably coherent body of ideas concerning practical means of how totally to change and reconstruct a society by force, or violence, based upon an all-inclusive or total criticism of what is wrong with existing or antecedent society.’ This total change and reconstruction in its very nature constitutes a ‘utopia’, and hence totalitarian ideologies are typically utopian in nature."
The US citizens don't have designs for anything but their own financial concerns, and those concerns are ever increasing daily. These "totalitarian tendencies" are not the ideology of the people, but stretch much further than the US, and they aren't exactly of the nature of utopian, as this article suggests.
In the old Webster's dictionary:
totalitarian - designating, of, or characteristic of a government or state in which one political party or group maintains complete control under a dictatorship and bans all others.
totalitarianism - a person who favors such a government or state.
|
by CreosoteChris on 10.05.2005 [22:26 ]
|
|
|
????
I haven't checked Webster's dictionary, but this strikes me as a pretty unlikely entry.
However I found Mahoso's article very compellingly-argued and coherent
Cheers Chris
"Just like Webster's dictionary,
We're morocco-bound..."
Hope and Crosby (IIRC)
|
by danieldives on 11.05.2005 [03:45 ]
|
|
|
Dear W,
Quote: The US citizens don't have designs for anything but their own financial concerns, and those concerns are ever increasing daily. These "totalitarian tendencies" are not the ideology of the people, but stretch much further than the US, and they aren't exactly of the nature of utopian, as this article suggests.
Reply: I wholeheartedly agree, W. The US policy/ies reflect the intensions of a handful of politically motivated and corporate backed powerbrokers who (in most cases) do not represent your average Joe/Jane 6-pack you’d meet out there in the streets. Without dissecting the US culture in a nutshell people/readers have to understand that Americans are human beings just like anyone else. I guess many people/readers have never set foot in the US, because otherwise they’d encountered a spirit not represented by Congress: a communal sense, volunteers who help out all over the place, friendliness, etc. When one bases one’s judgment of all Americans on the US’ foreign policies one’s verdict misses the essence of the judicial system and that is for jurors to want to obtain the truth and the facts the way they are.
Having said that, the US policies over the past 5 decades do exactly reflect what government after government accused the USSR of planning to do and through its actions the US military has been the worst Ambassador to the cause.
So people should pass judgment based on individual titles, because I am convinced that even in their own town, city or village people/readers will know somebody the really don’t like and that person is not an American, that’s for sure.
|
by George on 11.05.2005 [15:55 ]
|
|
|
Well fellow travellers it appears there be be a scandal on the horizon. CTV news actually used a blog originating out of the U.S. as a source for a story that is not supposed to told here in Canada. The Gomery Inquiry has a gag order to prevent the publishing of testimony from said Inquiry. That is not unusual for courts and judicial proceedings. However, what is new is that certain American websites are publishing day to day testimony, and EXPLOSIVE testimony it is. In a nutshell it appears our leaders are crooks. Surprise, surprise. Since 1867 we have been subject to TAG TEAM LOOTING by the two major parties - the liberals and the conservatives. 19th century railway scandals are hardly interesting today that is true, but the pattern has never really been recognized by the electorate. Party A gets caught with its fingers in the till. Party B exposes the scandal ousts Party A and puts its own fingers in the till. Party A falls by the wayside in the Inquiry mode with long boring hearings that interfere with hockey. After a few years Party A exposes Party B's thieving and we start all over again. That is TAG TEAM LOOTING. No one is held responsible; no one goes to jail; many become Senators or Commissioners or Ambassadors, etc. That is THE system.
However, we have other choices. We can refuse to vote and thereby allow smaller and smaller groups of thieves to be a majority government. We can bring back Parliamentary traditions like tarring and feathering and running said losers out of town on a rail (nobody with balls anymore) or we can vote outside of the box for the boy/girl next door - an independat or fringe party. That seems to be the most logical course of action.
That said WHY has mainstream turned on the Liberals with a US blog. There can only be one reason. ITS PAYBACK TIME. Martin and the Liberals turned down Uncle Sam and his Missile Defence. Now you're going to suffer. We'll get the CIA to unload some good truths on the net and embarrass the Canadian Government. The Canadian people will demand justice, force an election, get the Conservatives elected and voila - MISSILE DEFENCE APPROVED. Just to put those damn BEAVER lovers in their place we'll force them to pay tribute to THE GREAT SATAN by requiring them to line up with the Muslims with passports to await the body cavity search. SNAP as the glove is pulled taught or the gun bolt is cocked - it's all the same. We have a dysfunctional neighbhour who can only tolerate a power and control relationship - the kind the government warns girls about when abuse commercials are aired. So why would the same government get involved with UNCLE SAM when you know he's going to slap you around a little if you don't comply with his demands. Time to start the trap line and get out the fishin' pole and become self reliant again. Maybe some time struggling against the ODDS will find me the BALLS I need for Parliamentary Tradition, and we'll get the thievin' devils with hot tar not a Commission.
|
by danieldives on 12.05.2005 [01:05 ]
|
|
|
Dear G,
That's quite an interesting story, George.
No matter where I go/live/work there's always this club of money eatin' nitwits calling themselves leaders, rulers, politicians.
Next to them we should blame ourselves as well for not going out there and rail them outta town head first.
I live in Japan and here bribing is not even hidden, it is tax deductable as 'entertainment'....
|
by paul pawlowski on 22.06.2005 [10:45 ]
|
|
|
For One Thousand years Republican Englishman was not allowed
to exist.
Look up Tyburn Tree and the likes all over Britain to see what happened to those English men, women or children who dared imagine Republican England.
Vatican same thing — Vatican ABSOLUTE ideological totalitarianism.
|
|