|
|
Israel proposes naval blockade of Iran
By: Ria Novosti on: 21.05.2008 [10:38 ] (4033 reads)
|
(2543 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Israel proposes naval blockade of Iran
13:34 | 21/ 05/ 2008
TEL AVIV, May 21 (RIA Novosti) - The Israeli prime minister has proposed that a U.S. naval blockade be imposed on Iran to stop the Islamic Republic from moving ahead with its uranium enrichment program, an Israeli newspaper said on Wednesday.
According to the Haaretz daily, at a meeting in Jerusalem with the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, Ehud Olmert said, "The present economic sanctions against Iran have run out of steam," and proposed "a naval blockade of Iran," using the U.S. navy to limit movement in and out of the Islamic Republic by Iranian merchant ships.
As an alternative, he proposed placing restrictions on Iranian aircraft, businessmen and senior Iranian officials at airports throughout the world.
"Iranian businesspeople, unable to land anywhere in the world, would pressure the regime," Haaretz quoted Olmert as saying.
Iran has defied three rounds of relatively mild United Nations Security Council sanctions over its refusal to halt uranium enrichment, which many Western countries say is being used by Tehran as a cover for nuclear weapons development. Iran says the program is of an entirely peaceful nature and is necessary for energy production.
Russia and China, which have strong trade links with Iran, have so far prevented stronger sanctions against the Islamic Republic, using their vetoes on the Security Council.
Olmert reiterated that drastic measures to stop Iran's efforts to obtain nuclear weapons did not necessarily mean violence.
The newspaper did not provide a U.S. response to the Israeli proposals for a naval blockade. However, the White House yesterday categorically denied a report in the Jerusalem Post that U.S. President George W. Bush intended to attack Iran before the end of his final term of office in January 2009.
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the article was "not worth the paper it's written on."
The country's nuclear program has contributed to tensions between Washington, with Bush refusing late last year to rule out military action against Teheran despite a report by the country's intelligence community which suggested that the Islamic Republic had halted attempts to create a nuclear bomb in 2003.
Olmert is planning to visit Washington in June to discuss the Iranian nuclear program and prospects of U.S.-brokered peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.
Link
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 21.05.2008 [13:08 ]
|
|
|
Ron Paul and others have warned about how Israel tries to use the USA to fight Israel's wars.
The pro-Israeli lobby has done much to push the USA into war in Iraq.
Now, they're pushing the USA towards war with Iran over Iran's.
A US naval blockade on Iran would be one step closer to all out war.
Here we once again see Israel moving the region closer to catastrophe and carnage.
It's not enough that they heap misery on the lives of innocent Palestinians, and it's not enough that they kidnap East European children for sex slavery, but they also push the USA to do their evil bidding on their behalf.
Of course, the USA doesn't need much pushing, it does plenty of evil on its own such as its bombing of Vietnam and Cambodia, its nuclear testing in the Marshall islands, its shooting down of an Iranian passenger plane, its support of Contra terrorists, etc,
|
by Legolas_Greenleaf on 21.05.2008 [13:25 ]
|
|
|
backed up by a dying empire. They're getting desperate.
A naval blockade is an act of war and a violation of all international treaties, but apparently those treaties don't apply to Israhell and Occupied Yankistan. The Squatter State would like nothing better than to start a global nuclear war, to rid as many Goyim as possible, friends and foes alike. It's simply a state of depravity, a pox on the earth, a virus consuming all the "west" and perverting our nations and our sovereignty.
Israel does NOT have a "right to exist", they have a right to be buried, as deeply as possible, for eternity.
|
by cosmo on 21.05.2008 [19:09 ]
|
|
|
Any such move is nothing but a declaration of war.
However the Talmudist Zionists want that their creators to carry on the load but both parties belong to most cowardly creations on this planet.
Bombing Gaza is fun since the Palestinians are nothing but basically medieval Stone Throwers.
Bombing every other nation that has no proper protection like, Iraq Afghanistan, Somalia, etc is all fun.
Their days are coming whether they like it or not, its starts with their economy and ends with their society disintegrating into hell.
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 21.05.2008 [22:05 ]
|
|
|
Nixon and Kissinger bombed the smithereens out of Cambodia and Vietnam, yet most US people had little problem with that.
McCain glibly sang, "bomb Iran" and yet he is the Republican candidate.
|
by LittleHelper on 21.05.2008 [23:53 ]
|
|
|
First, it would not work, as there is no relationship
between iranian Uranium enrichment and naval
acitivities of Iran.
Anyway, to thirds of the iranian border are on land
and not coastal line, so it would not hinder iranian
and foreign goods to travel accross the border.
Second: In retaliation, Iran could consider closing
down the Strait of Hormuz.
This would immediately send the oil price through
the roof.
I don't think, there is anyone in the west, who would
really like to pay $10 per gallon of fuel.
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 22.05.2008 [00:58 ]
|
|
|
Most of Iran's borders are on land.
Iran's coastal line are also large, and would be difficult to secure, especially since Iran has submarines.
On a practical level, Olmert's proposal is just desperation and fluf, as you have pointed out.
|
by cosmo on 22.05.2008 [07:43 ]
|
|
|
The whole presidential step dancing show is just for the Sheeple to convince them that they have choices and are free.
All of the Zionist US presidents were and are Window Dressing for the criminals that really run that country since the early days.
|
by ruzam on 22.05.2008 [10:25 ]
|
|
|
Inexorably the truth about 911 will nail zionism's hide to the wall for when Americans know in sufficient numbers that their own elected leadership not only shafted them by those 3,000 deaths but also did it for Israel - and with plenty of expert assistance, the physical consequences for Israel will be as if Hiroshima and Nagasaki seemed minor for Japan.
A psychotic people do not know that they are, as reference normality is each other, and think it a normal emotion to hugely enjoy the prospect and actuality of destroying utterly, nations near and far, starting with near, for the usual `reasons` of WMD or nukes, that they think might wash with non jews, but really because it's fun to commit mass murder for religious reasons. The mass murder of Lebanese and the destruction of Lebanon 2 yrs ago had full Rabbinical approval from America. The Israeli Rabbis said nothing. More recently one of their Rabbis said that 1,000 Arabs were not worth one jew - with reference to Gaza. Some religion.
Bush has grovellingly pledged to protect Israel no matter what many times, which is a clear invitation for Israel to do a false flag before he leaves office, but with several months to spare lest it be thought he is dropping a pile of dung into his successor's lap. Clearly he doesn't have much time, especially if the business can't be concluded as quickly as planned.
|
by ILYANA_ROZUMOVA on 22.05.2008 [14:05 ]
|
|
|
You were correct. I was joking.
|
by ILYANA_ROZUMOVA on 22.05.2008 [14:09 ]
|
|
|
Concerning rules:
(What I meant by limits)
1, The board rules stipulate that obscenities should be avoided. Not many people keep
this rule. I understand man, and that they swore sometimes. (My husband swears
occasionally at me, although very rarely.)
But to spew endless obscenities is really not very dignified either for person writing
it or for the website. Spewing obscenities suppose to show how macho the person is
and deep his convictions are. Not really! It just shows lack of ideas. And lack of
ability to reason.
2, Comments should be on the point or the points of the above article and not pointless
blabbing.
3, Comments should say something, and have some meaning and not repetitions of some
embedded views, which have nothing to do with the article.
4, If we do not talk about the article than why bother to post them here. Just make some
window where we can swear at each other, swear at US, Europe, Al word, swear at
holocaust deniers, holocaust supporters, swear at Muslims and their gods, swear at
Christians and their gods etc. (Does it finally sound to you at least a little bit comical?)
Something big is “in the pipeline”. Something “big” is going to happen.
Maybe NATO is going to attack Russia. Maybe Pakistan will attack Iran.
Maybe China will auction off all its dollar holdings. Maybe US is going to attack Venezuela. Maybe US after nationalizing its debt will also nationalize its holdings.
Maybe there will be socialistic revolutions all over the world.
We do not know, we can only guess.
The suspense is mesmerizing.
So lets watch and analyze the events leading to the great “showdown”.
Instead of petty personal and non personal attacks and swearing.
Please lets not be stupid!
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 22.05.2008 [14:46 ]
|
|
|
The economic consequences would be negative, not only for Iran, but for a great many other nations also. Consider Iran's trade volume with Gulf countries, China, Europe, and other nations.
The world markets would take a hit, and the USA's recession would worsen.
That would ruin any chances the republicans have of gaining another term in presidency.
Perhaps the republicans know that they are going to lose this next round, and so they are willing perhaps to be a bit reckless.
The result would be a hit to the international markets, an anti-Amerikan backlash in Iran, greater US military spending (to enforce the blockade), a worsening of the US recession, and reduced chances of republican presidential victory.
|
by informatron on 22.05.2008 [14:56 ]
|
|
|
2, Comments should be on the point or the points of the above article and not pointless
blabbing.
|
by Deathtodubya on 22.05.2008 [14:58 ]
|
|
|
"I don't think, there is anyone in the west, who would
really like to pay $10 per gallon of fuel."
Shit, in Poland and Romania two poor countries you already pay 2 dollars per litre for fuel, znd it's not like they have the incomes to easily afford it, yet are hardly howling for revolution as they did in 89!
|
by informatron on 22.05.2008 [15:00 ]
|
|
|
"Perhaps the republicans know that they are going to lose this next round, and so they are willing perhaps to be a bit reckless."
US presidents are NOT elected, they are SELECTED
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 22.05.2008 [15:23 ]
|
|
|
"US presidents are NOT elected, they are SELECTED."
Good point.
How true that is. We saw Ohio with its diebold machines in 2004, and Florida with its uncounted ballots in 2000.
Furthermore, US presidents only echo the wishes of an established moneyed elite, and not any creative mind of their own.
|
by albash on 22.05.2008 [15:24 ]
|
|
|
The timing of US-Israel-UK to attack Iran!
Helped by the media prostitutes the USraelis are preparing the ground for war with Iran. On a visit to the US, The Zionist General Mofaz, confirmed that Israel has made the necessary preparations for an attack on Iran and "our friends" have already been informed and their approval has been received. In London the Zionist foreign minister briefed the British government on the latest Israeli intelligence concerning Iran nuclear programs emphasising the need to deal with the "danger". The Pentagon ordered a second Task force to the Gulf headed by Aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln. Bush promoted Hawkish General Petraeus as commander of the Middle East force replacing General Fallon, who was against a war on Iran. In appeasing the US Jewish Lobby, Hilary Clinton went out of her way to threaten Iran with annihilation if ever dared attacking Israel but naturally, not if Israel attacks Iran. Many people question the ability of America to launch a third war while the US troops are bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan. The US with its economic meltdown coupled with huge trilion dollar debt cannot set condition for war. The attack on Iran will definitely end with a severe damage to USraeli interests and disrupts their wicked designs for the Middle East.
|
by Throw_Off_The_Killer on 22.05.2008 [16:36 ]
|
|
|
The economic conditions in the US are becoming worse by the day. Just in my area, gasoline has gone up 50 cents per gallon in just a few weeks. It's rising daily now with consistency. Basic commodities are also going up.
This, I feel, is their dilemma. They know the collapse is coming. They know there is no solution. They know the public is discontented. They are having their criminality exposed. You now have a republican Congresswoman openly calling for a new 9/11 investigation.
Their hearts are throbbing with vice and fear, as is the heart of any criminal. The entire rest of the world has them up against the wall with shotguns pointed at their heads.
What is their only option here? More conflict. More war. Anything to distract attention from their own duplicity and treachery. Anything to cover up their crimes.
They have broken into the home to steal the booty, and subsequently killed the homeowner. They hear the police sirens in the distance and are looking for a match....
|
by Throw_Off_The_Killer on 22.05.2008 [16:49 ]
|
|
|
special division, the "Department of Global Anti-Semitism" which states;
1. Any assertion "that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world" is anti-Semitic.
2. "Strong anti-Israel sentiment" is anti-Semitic.
3. "Virulent criticism" of Israel's leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic. According to the State Department, anti-Semitism occurs when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behavior of a past or present Zionist leader. Thus, a cartoon that includes a swastika to criticize Ariel Sharon's brutal 2002 invasion of the West Bank, raining "hell-fire" missiles on hapless Palestinian men, women and children, is anti-Semitic. Similarly, when the word "Zionazi" is used to describe Sharon's saturation bombing in Lebanon in 1982 (killing 17,500 innocent refugees), it is also "anti-Semitic."
4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.
5. Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.
6. Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the "New World Order") is anti-Semitic.
7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.
8. Diminishing the "six million" figure of Holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.
9. Calling Israel a "racist" state is anti-Semitic.
10. Asserting that there exists a "Zionist Conspiracy" is anti-Semitic.
11. Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.
12. Making "derogatory statements about Jewish persons" is anti-Semitic.
13. Denying spiritually disobedient Jews the biblical right to re-occupy Palestine is anti-Semitic.
14. Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.
Just how desperate are they to criminalize all of us?
|
by Bl4ckP0pe on 22.05.2008 [16:54 ]
|
|
|
Previous Top News - A Response to Gerry's personal message
original Gerry Hile's - Personal Message
related Legolas - Lack of commentary
more discussion - Is More Censorship Coming for the Internet?
and finally, a FILM TIP
I highly recommend everybody grab a copy of ''Meeting Resistance'':
Official blurb: "MEETING RESISTANCE is a verité-style non-fiction feature-length film set in the streets, alleyways and ubiquitous teashops of the Adamiyah neighborhood of Baghdad, 2003/2004. It enters the physical and psychological heart of the "Insurgency" against the American-led occupation. Photojournalists/directors Steve Connors and Molly Bingham spent ten-months among the insurgents there to create this exclusive, unique, and at once horrifying, compelling and insightful film about their lives, motivation, and goals. — What would you do if America was invaded?"
imdb.com/title/tt0823219/
Snag it HERE -> thepiratebay.org/tor/4112860/Meeting_Resistance_2007_Documentary
84min TRT, 700MB
Video: XVID 512x368 29.97fps 1009Kbps
Audio: MPEG Audio Layer 3 48000Hz stereo 128Kbps
|
by NOMOREWAR_FORISRAEL on 22.05.2008 [17:36 ]
|
|
|
http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
Click on the Ron Paul youtube link at the following URL:
http://hightidepromo.com
Click on the picture of Lieberman putting the Yarmulke on McCain at the following URL:
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/03/make-people-aware-subscribe.html
|
by djandjolik on 22.05.2008 [17:57 ]
|
|
|
By the same token, more less long time ago one of the concentration camp SS Komandant said that 1,000 jews were not worth one "drunken and debauches" SS Totenkoft guard
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 22.05.2008 [19:28 ]
|
|
|
Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said Iran-China trade ties has increased noticeably in the last three years from 10 billion dollars annually to 20 billion.
www1.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-22/0805227276012330.htm
China won't be happy about a blockade on Iran which causes China to lose oil shipments, or makes China unable to export goods to Iran.
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 22.05.2008 [19:49 ]
|
|
|
Right, that was Rabbi Eliyahu, who as you may know, also advocated carpet bombing Gaza (according to the Jerusalem Post).
|
by ILYANA_ROZUMOVA on 22.05.2008 [20:22 ]
|
|
|
is high time that Iran stops all this nuclear wepons bulding nonsense.
It is time for them to finally "wise up".
They just can't get the "hint".
They should buy the warheads complete vith delivery systems from USA. That is what USA wants. Because they need now "hard curency".
|
by patriaaustria on 22.05.2008 [23:09 ]
|
|
|
Terrorist Country's are USA, Britain and Israel, since the Weapons of MD are located in same . Israel will never stop agitating in order to start ME Conflagration to for their nefarious Purpose.
|
by Legolas_Greenleaf on 23.05.2008 [00:16 ]
|
|
|
You know what you are? You're like some over-the-hill, fat-body. cross-dressing queen lusting after some teenage boy. It's as pathetic as homosexual opera can get. Your one claim to fame is some IMAGINARY "confrontation" between us, on a subject long ago discredited. Get off your knees, buttboy.
|
by Bl4ckP0pe on 23.05.2008 [00:31 ]
|
|
|
I don't follow your innuendo.
Can you, or somebody, translate this outburst for me?
|
by Legolas_Greenleaf on 23.05.2008 [01:07 ]
|
|
|
i'd like to propose the UNblockading of Bush-Cheney-Pelosi's bowels in the direct "line of fire" of Israel and it's warped Talmudic death wish for all of US.
|
by ruzam on 23.05.2008 [03:35 ]
|
|
|
`concentration camp SS Komandant said that 1,000 jews were not worth one "drunken and debauches" SS Totenkoft guard.`
Right, and you guys in Israel have had 63+ yrs to not be like Nazis, instead you seek to outdo them. And that is not hard to do as your central icon of the HoloFraud, the Homicidal Gas Chamber did not exist anywhere as the specimens shown to tourists at Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen were constructed after the war. The one at Sachsenhausen was built late in 1945 and torn down in 1952 as the Soviets were being met with too much incredulity when trying to relate the official story. The Auschwitz one was built in 1948 and the gullible tourists are not told this. There were, however, delousing facilities for the clothing that people wore as typhus carried by the lice would othewise kill many.
|
by chattaway on 23.05.2008 [04:04 ]
|
|
|
A naval blockade is a formal act of war. It is no different from a seige or a bombing campaign or an invasion.
Yet it is out their repeated by complete morons and fools as being somehow a lesser act of war than an invasion.
|
by darwinsturtle on 23.05.2008 [06:35 ]
|
|
|
out of existence; no more kike terrorists waging war on behalf of Israhell!!!
|
by picard-fortune-500 on 23.05.2008 [07:47 ]
|
|
|
ht tp://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/105240-0/ & ht tp://www.jews-did-911.com/
|
by poiuytr on 23.05.2008 [09:14 ]
|
|
|
Good list. Why not just have one brolly term: speaking is anti-semitic.
BTW, the trouble with all of it is that Semites aren't just jews but Arabs. Syrians are Semites. So using their diseased terminology... the west fuckers can't even get their terminology right, that's who whacked these fiends are... being anti-semitic means being anti-Syrian or anti-Iraqi. That sounds like Bush and the hoards of the US plains baboons.
It's all complete pile of shit, the west.
|
by poiuytr on 23.05.2008 [09:28 ]
|
|
|
Precisely. Israel's desperate and they've been so trying to inveigle the US to kill for them and the stupid yanks are like "shiiite, man, we bleedin in Iraq... we aint got no gaaaas, our ships crash cuz the damn Hormuz is sooo damn narrow... dontcha remember Lebanon 2006, even they peppered you with rockets, what you think Iran's gonna do to our mighty navy?"
The yanks are so broke, it's funny. A few more months and the entire US crap is falling off the cliff. Israel's gonna be incredibly lonely at that moment and with lots of pretty angry neighbours.
Either way though, it's finished. The west is just finished.
Germany, Israel, France, any west bitch, it's done, even without wars. Even without the dollar nuking. Jews in Israel just like little pretty blond fair skinned clowns in Germany are becoming and swiftly so minorities in their "own" land. Sure, Israel has laws about no-marriages and no-public office for Arabs, but as it is, Arabs are becoming the majority in Israel. The birth rates are so against the west in every single western nation that the west is over anyway. If one adds, the dollar death, which means no US, no aid to Israel, no EU, it's over that much quicker.
Germans are running what some astounding 1,2 birth rate now while some 20M ouslandaers, as they call them though they're born in Germany run a birth rate over 4. And Merkel refuses to naturalise them, even though they're born in Germany, speak German, and live and work in Germany, because they're just plain racist. Israel's the same thing trying in vain to spur birth rates calling for jew immigration to Israel etc. Merkel even called on several occasions for more fucking by the white blondies in Germany. She didn't quite say that but she called for more white babies several times, exactly the same thing Hitler did. The same goes for France and Britain and so on, the entire EU.
I bet these nations are so desperate that they'll pull another Hitler and establish fuck places where chicks are made to have babies for the society and the strongest of their lot are made to go in and fuck them. It's very sordid and sounds like some perverted sci-fi but it's true. Hitler did it and I bet they're just about there today, if not already doing that under some gov't subsidy deal offering tax breaks for having pretty little "native" gov't-approved babies.
What's however the most sordid to me is how the western swill monkeys are complacent with this total insane reign of these most vile murderers.
|
by paul pawlowski on 23.05.2008 [10:21 ]
|
|
|
Going to Accrington police station reporting that Ariel Sharon sent Jew suicide pilots to fly jetliners into World Trade Centre
bush blair accomplices is anti Semitic
|
by Syrian on 23.05.2008 [10:51 ]
|
|
|
IsraHell and its US controller are losers. Watching them is pathetic, and it makes me cringe whenever I see them plan. They're both finished, its not even worth commenting on this particular plan.
|
by ILYANA_ROZUMOVA on 23.05.2008 [13:44 ]
|
|
|
See my comment,
On legolases lack of comments.
And you will be puzzled no more.
That is in the store.
|
by xtal on 23.05.2008 [19:54 ]
|
|
|
www.permindex.org/
L’ANONIMA ASSASSINI DELLA GRAN BRETAGNA: PERMINDEX
a great piece of dirty story ... sorry in italian
|
by Rubber on 23.05.2008 [23:31 ]
|
|
|
Israel Arrests Outspoken Academic Norman Finkelstein
(T)he American academic Norman Finkelstein has been arrested and ordered deported from Israel. Finkelstein arrived in Tel Aviv earlier today on his way to the Occupied Territories. He was immediately detained and told he is banned from Israel for ten years. He’s expected to be deported tomorrow. Finkelstein is known one of the most prominent academic critics of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.
www.democracynow.org/2008/5/23/headlines
-
More on Finkelstein's arrest in Israel
US political author Norman Finkelstein denied entry to Israel
05.23.2008
Jerusalem - The US political author and critic of Israel Norman Finkelstein was denied entry to the Jewish state on Friday, his lawyer said.
Finkelstein landed at Ben Gurion international airport near Tel Aviv in the early morning and was told by a representative of the ministry of interior that he would not be allowed into the country on 'security' grounds, attorney Michael Sfard told dpa.
'This usually means a 10-year ban on entry,' Sfard added.
Finkelstein, who is Jewish and the son of Holocaust survivors, has written critical books on Israeli policies in the Palestinian territories and on what he called 'exploitation' of the Jewish tragedy during World War II.
Finkelstein has received with the fierce disapproval of some authors and academics, while others have praised his controversial works.
www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=1700
|
by ruzam on 24.05.2008 [08:05 ]
|
|
|
Lessee now, as Israel proposes a US naval blockade of Iran, why couldn't Iran - i'm sure they had instantly thought of it also - park one naval vessel in the eastern Mediterranean in international waters and ask the Israelis whether they like an Iranian presence off their coast ?
Zionist Warmonger ABCBCNNBCBS would rather not cover it, but the novel newsworthiness coupled with other players putting vision clips onto the net will force them to ask, and broadcast, the Iranian govt's reasons, which succinctly put, amount to asking why US naval vessels are not in their home ports ?
Probably Iran's naval vessels in their small area home waters of the Persian Gulf will, within the hour of unprovoked assault by USrael, be destroyed, and as it really is now a case of when rather than if, then it may be possible to stop this inevitability by parking just that one token Iranian naval vessel just beyond Israel's territorial limits.
This really is no different to Khruschev in 1962 parking some missiles in Cuba to bring to Kennedy's attention that he didn't like US missiles parked in Turkey. These in Turkey were quietly withdrawn after a seeming victory for Kennedy when Soviet missiles were withdrawn from Cuba.
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
