|
|
China calls U.S. blocking of its seafood imports indiscriminate and unacceptable
By: AP on: 30.06.2007 [12:41 ] (1951 reads)
|
(3272 bytes) [c]
|
|
China calls U.S. blocking of its seafood imports indiscriminate and unacceptable
The Associated PressPublished: June 29, 2007
BEIJING: China called a U.S. block on its seafood 'indiscriminate' and 'unacceptable' and urged closer cooperation on food safety between the two trading partners, state media said Saturday.
"China cannot accept the indiscriminate and automatic detention of four kinds of Chinese seafood by the United States," Li Changjiang, the head of China's top quality watchdog, was quoted as saying.
Li made his comments late Friday during a telephone conversation with U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt, the official Xinhua News Agency reported.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Thursday it would detain Chinese catfish, basa and dace, as well as shrimp and eel after repeated testing turned up contamination with drugs that have not been approved in the United States for use in farmed seafood.
U.S. officials said there have been no reports of illnesses or evidence to suggest the products pose any immediate health risk. They stopped short of ordering a ban on the fresh and frozen seafood.
The action comes amid a slew of consumer alerts by U.S. federal regulators over lead paint in Chinese-made toy trains, defective tires from the eastern city of Hangzhou, and imported Chinese toothpaste made with diethylene glycol, a toxic ingredient more commonly found in antifreeze.
The safety scandals have put at risk surging Chinese agricultural exports to the United States, which reached US$2.26 billion last year, led by poultry products, sausage casings, shellfish, spices and apple juice.
Li, the head of China's General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, said there were a "handful of Chinese seafood enterprises" that had problems with quality control but that this did not warrant the blanket detention of all Chinese exports of those types of seafood, Xinhua reported.
He told Leavitt some U.S. exports to China also had quality issues and that the two sides should properly resolve such problems by cooperating more closely.
Earlier this week, China announced it had seized shipments of U.S.-made orange pulp and dried apricots containing high levels of bacteria and preservatives.
According to the Xinhua report, Li told Leavitt that China "attaches great importance to the safety of its food exports" and had already taken steps to deal with the problematic seafood. The report did not say if he outlined specific measures.
"China and the United States must join hands to ensure the safety of their two-way food trade," the report quoted Li as saying.
Leavitt was quoted as saying the U.S. would send a team to China soon to negotiate a solution to the seafood matter.
The FDA said sampling of Chinese imported fish between October and May repeatedly found traces of the antibiotics nitrofuran and fluoroquinolone, as well as the antifungals malachite green and gentian violet.
Under the new restrictions, the FDA will allow individual shipments of the seafood types if a company can show the products are free of residues of these drugs.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/30/asia/AS-GEN-China-Tainted-Products.php
by gmmonko on 01.07.2007 [08:59 ]
|
|
|
...to dangerous, poisonous and not regulated or documented. All the cheap labor shit out of China isn't worse a cent.
Sorry!
|
by eureka on 01.07.2007 [14:21 ]
|
|
|
I have to say this: any type of american claims, whether positive or negative, against another country must be carefully scrutinized in order to discover if there could be a hidden agenda behind the claim.
I'll give you an example: many years ago, we saw TV films of 'The Untouchables' with Fed Agent Elliott Ness. And in these pictures one can recall that back then, the mobsters and organized gangs like The Cosa Nostra, The Mafia etc would enter night clubs and other businesses and tell the owners that they need protection.
Evidently, this protection would come at a price. Initially the owners would refuse to pay the gangs the protection money and the gangs would return sometime later and wreck the place, damaging everything in site. Police would be called but nothing would come out of it.
And when the owners managed to reopen their businesses the gangsters would return and remind them that they need protection; only on this occasion, they would accept and pay the gangs to avoid a repeat of what occurred the first time around.
I am not suggesting here that China should be absolved of any blame of the poor quality of the seafood but one cannot overlook the possibility that the foods could have been tampered with subsequent to being shipped from China, with the main purpose of, at minimum, putting the Chinese on the defensive while at the same time taking the focus away from the real culprits who could be the americans in this case.
Again the question needs to be asked: who stands to benefit? Certainly not China; and given america's rigorous methods of scrutiny of agricultural and all other imports, there is a little flesh here for the skeleton. I would be most surprised if the Chinese would wittingly and intentionally export food to america of tainted quality; given the propensity for being discovered and blackballed.
It is so easy to place a poisonous substance in a syringe needle and inject a food item with it leaving practically little or no trace of evidence. The irony about is: you only have to sabotage a few crates in thousands and just two negative stories reaching the press can have a devastating effect on the entire shipment.
When listening to american mouthings, listen, observe and research what they say very carefully indeed.
|
by verve on 01.07.2007 [15:46 ]
|
|
|
agreed. Most Chinese made products are crap. Very little, if any, quality control. But.......what's not made in China today? Matters little what store shelves one looks at, all merchandizers carry the stuff. Fruit on Candian shelves is required to be labled as to point of origin, everything EXCEPT the Chinese produce is labled as to where its from. Unfortunitly, most Chinese exporters are foreign Corps doing business in China and anyone familar with 'corporate' greed knows that profits come first, lawsuits can be handled later with a wad of cash.
Also should be noted, that 'problems' with products are sometimes manufactured by larger competitors seeking larger market share or wanting to buy up small competitors to monopolize market.
|
|